Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bonilla v. Garrido
as 4:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Garcia Bonilla
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddie Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonilla v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Garcia Bonilla
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodrigo Garcia Garcia v. William Barr
as 20-72636
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
RODRIGO GARCIA GARCIA, AKA Rodrigo Garcia
Garcia-Loza v. USA
as 3:2020cv00031
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Garcia-Loza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Rodrigo Ramirez-Garcia
as 19-50958
Defendant / Appellant:
RODRIGO RAMIREZ-GARCIA, also known as Rodrigo Rmz, also known as Rodrigo Ramirez Garcia, also known as Rodrigo Garcia, also known as Rodrigo Garcia-Ramirez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Minnfee v. Bartley et al
as 5:2018cv00194
Defendant:
T. Cline, Dr Lannette Linthicum, NFN Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
USA v. Daniel Bello
as 15-20755
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL GARCIA BELLO, also known as Daniel Bello, also known as Daniel Garcia, also known as Daniel Belo, also known as Daniel R. Garcia, also known as Daniel Rodrigo Garcia, also known as Daniel Garcia-Belo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Tost Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01348
Defendant:
Mohammad Choudry, Grocery Tost Cafe, Inc., John Doe Corp. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
