Cases 11 - 20 of 280
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv01638
Petitioner:
Elmer Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. USA
as 2:2023cv01351
Petitioner:
MIGUEL A. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Iklas R. Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff of FCI-Schuylkill, Warden Beth Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Briggs et al
as 1:2023cv01021
Petitioner:
Quame Wilfredo Denzel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Gregory Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Gimy Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Navarro-Rodriguez v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Marcial Navarro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez-Rodriguez v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
as 1:2023cv00816
Petitioner:
Yoandrys Perez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
Elmer Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
