Cases 41 - 50 of 1,211
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Armando Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez v. Warden B. Rodriguez
as 6:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Warden B. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden B. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv00862
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Warden B. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v Cricket Wireless et al
as 4:2023cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Whatley
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Jaqueline Rodriguez, Heather Rose Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and F.J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez v. Palomo et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Armando Gomez
Defendant:
Jacobb Palomo, Castorena, Jose Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 5:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Xavier Rodriguez, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01545
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers and NFN Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downum v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Downum
Defendant:
Richard Kirkpatrick, Chief Deputy Jamie Garza, Asst. Chief Deputy Kohl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
