Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Burt-Brazziel v. Glaze et al
as 2:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Howard Elwon Burt-Brazziel
Defendant:
Glaze, Simmons, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, Hoffman, . Trisha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Huibregtse et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Darryl Allen Flynn
Defendant:
Charles Huibregtse, Nathan Tapio, Mary Gorske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv03004
Plaintiff:
Frankie N. Walker
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Liberty Health Care, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmonson v. Marcell et al
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
CO Mariah Marcell, CO JA, Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Guyton et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Qwanell S Jones
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Jones, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gorsi et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Shamaila Gorsi, Jana Huston, Carrie Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Floyd et al
as 3:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones and Audrain L Jones
Defendant:
Michelle Floyd, Micheal R Hasty, Craig McCartt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Guyton et al
as 1:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Turner, . Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
