Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Jackson v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Commodore Jackson
Defendant:
Taylor Godinez, Warden Spiller, Warden Gaetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv09397
Plaintiff:
Darnell Henderson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Watson et al
as 3:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
Sydney Davis
Defendant:
Rick Watson, Mearl Justus, John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Donald Farris
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ty J. Bates, Victor Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunderson v. Pharls et al
as 1:2013cv03792
Plaintiff:
Sean Gunderson
Defendant:
Jeff Pharls, Elgin Mental Health Center (EMHC), Paul Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv07797
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jody Weiss, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Talbot et al
as 2:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paul Talbot, John Doe, Peter Soe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Hulick
as 3:2008cv03118
Petitioner:
Jon Roe Morgan
Respondent:
Donald Hulick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alliance To End, et al v. Rochford, et al
as 1:1974cv03268
Plaintiff:
Alliance To End Repression , Chicago Area Unitarian - Universalist Council, Chicago Community To Defend The Bill of Rights and others
Defendant:
James M Rochford , Mitchell Ware , Walter Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
