Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Griffin v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00870
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe and Doug Maue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Doe et al v. Macomb Community Unit School District No. 185 et al
as 1:2018cv01072
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Macomb Community Unit School District No. 185 , Board of Education of Macomb Community School District No. 185 , John Rumley and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Carr v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv07297
Plaintiff:
Darenda Carr
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Marcus Myles, James Padar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00768
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv04184
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Soo Song, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Muhammad v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2017cv04188
Plaintiff:
Ronald Muhammad
Defendant:
PNC Bank, Does 1-100 , Roes 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Wirth et al v. Zimmer, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv03266
Plaintiff:
Mary Wirth and David Wirth
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. , Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla et al v. Langley et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Padilla, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Joanna Langley, Brian Dawson, Jeff Pharis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
