Cases 71 - 80 of 214
Thomas E. Andrews et al v. Travis J. Ludlow et al
as 2:2019cv01226
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Roes, Priority Homes, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Andrews and Ruthellen Sheflin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas E. Andrews et al v. Mitch R. Wade et al
as 2:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Andrews and Ruthellen Sheflin
Defendant:
Roes, Does 1-10 inclusive, Mitch R. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan v. Continental Home Loans Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
Zahir Khan
Defendant:
Bank Of America, Jane "Roes", Russell Carl Burcheri, Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruciata, Timothy Branan, John Scanlon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ye v. Police Department in New Castle, Delaware et al
as 1:2018cv01781
Defendant:
Police Department in New Castle, Delaware, PTLM W. Cuzo-Benites and Mary Roe
Plaintiff:
Ning Ye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DLMC, Inc. v. Flores
as 1:2018cv00352
Defendant:
Doe Corporations/Entities 1-10, Loving Care Health Provider, Inc., Roe Individuals 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
DLMC, Inc.
Ye v. Police Department in New Castle, Delaware et al
as 1:2018cv04273
Plaintiff:
Ning Ye
Defendant:
Police Department in New Castle, Delaware, PTLM W. Cuzo-Benites and Mary Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2018cv05566
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Bowen
Defendant:
Kesha Rogers, Mazda Capital Services c/o Chase, JPMorgan Chase Bank, USA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Pereda v. MGM Resorts International et al
as 2:2018cv05570
Defendant:
MGM Resorts Festival Grounds, LLC, DOE Security Officer, ROE Retailers and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Pereda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nano Gas Technologies Inc v. Roe
as 2:2018mc50752
Plaintiff:
Nano Gas Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Clifton Roe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
