Cases 71 - 80 of 217
JANE DOE et al v. NESSET
as 1:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE , "ERIN" , "VICKY" and others
Defendant:
KIRK NESSET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ATKINS et al v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE et al
as 2:2016cv04503
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ATKINS , ANDREW DUREN and JOEL DAVENPORT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, PHOENIXVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT JOHN ROES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. BURNS AND ROE SERVICES CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv00994
Plaintiff:
DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Defendant:
BURNS AND ROE SERVICES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORLINA v. DOE et al
as 2:2016cv02696
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY FORLINA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JAMES MORACE, DONALD ALLABAND, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUHS et al v. MCLACHLAN DRILLING COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
ERIC FUHS , JEFFREY BAILEY , WILLIAMS LAFLEUR and others
Defendant:
MCLACHLAN DRILLING COMPANY and JAMES E. MCLACHLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BANKS v. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016mc00061
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE, DAVID HICTON, ROBERT CESSAR and others
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
Roe v. The Pennsylvania Game Commission et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Carl Roe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania Game Commission, Bradley C. Bechtel, Robert W. Schlemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
