Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Gilgenbach v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2017cv01807
Plaintiff:
Curt Gilgenbach
Defendant:
United States Incorporated , State Of Illinois, DuPage County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc. v. Roe
as 1:2017cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Clifton Roe
Counter_claimant:
Clifton Roe
Counter_defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trivedi et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10633
Plaintiff:
Arvind Trivedi and Mino Trivedi
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Orthopeadic Surgical Products, Inc. and others
In_re:
Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implaint Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gdowik v. Hardy et al
as 1:2016cv10463
Plaintiff:
Conrad Gdowik
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Jeff Pharis, Kareemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kovaka v. Reilly et al
as 1:2016cv08845
Plaintiff:
Brian Kovaka
Defendant:
Justin Reilly, Shawn Schuldt, Curtis Raney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadzhafaliyev v. Hardy et al
as 1:2016cv06844
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Jeff Pharis, Nidea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv04452
Plaintiff:
Tambrasha Hudson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primerica Financial Services, Inc. et al v. Roe et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Primerica Financial Services, Inc. and PFS Investments Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy Roe , Pamela Bettenhausen and John DeMarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mullins v. Beitel et al
as 1:2015cv10993
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Mullins
Defendant:
Gregory Beitel, Clint D. Myers, John B. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
