Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Doe et al v. Aransas County et al
as 2:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Aransas County, Roman Cortez and Paul Noel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clow v. Sheraton Hotel et al
as 4:2014mc02252
Plaintiff:
Lorna Renee Clow
Defendant:
Sheraton Hotel and Lourdes Roe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Salazar v. Officer John Roe et al
as 5:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Salazar
Defendant:
Officer John Roe, Other Unknown Officers and City Of Laredo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility et al
as 4:2013cv03418
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Stewart
Respondent:
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roca-Buigas v. Poisson et al
as 4:2013cv02152
Plaintiff:
Roberto Roca-Buigas
Defendant:
Renald Poisson, Clutch Sportz, LLC, Companies A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
S. v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Maria S.
Defendant:
John Doe, Robert Roe, James Loe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Palacios v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 5:12cv120.
as 5:2012cv00191
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Julien and John Roe
Plaintiff:
Jerardo Joel Palacios, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Palacios v. Julien et al
as 5:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jerardo Joel Palacios, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Julien and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollgener v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01337
Plaintiff:
James Dollgener
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc , Zimmer Production, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
