Cases 11 - 20 of 531
Mounson v. Walker et al
as 1:2013cv01501
Plaintiff:
Henry Mounson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., Robert S Frey, Terry L. McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 13-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, GLADYS TAYLOR, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and others
William Bouchez v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-3429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BOUCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., EDDIE JONES, Warden, SYLVIA MAHONE and others
Reed v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07265
Plaintiff:
Gerald Reed
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Kevin Holloran, Allen Karraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Edgar et al
as 1:2012cv06188
Plaintiff:
Alvin F Jones
Defendant:
Jim Edgar, George Ryan, Rod Blagojevich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-2799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Whitmore v. Walker et al
as 3:2012cv00771
Plaintiff:
Troy D Whitmore
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Warden Uchtman, Melody J Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Taylor et al
as 1:2012cv01043
Plaintiff:
Floyd May
Defendant:
Gladyse Taylor, Michael Randle, Roger E Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Pink et al
as 1:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Garner
Defendant:
Shah Vi Pink, Roger E. Walker, Jr, Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Taylor et al
as 1:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Floyd May
Defendant:
Gladyse Taylor, Michael Randle, Roger E. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
