Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Rogers et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Leland Rogers and Alissa Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rogers et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Leland Rogers and Alissa Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Watkinson
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, John Conant, Earl Hauser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kibby v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Roger A. Kibby
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, et al
as 4:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Warner v. Towslee et al
as 3:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Eugene George Warner
Defendant:
Joe Towslee, Stephen W. Sanger , Roger Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Revet v. Horton et al
as 3:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Revet
Defendant:
Kevin Horton, S. Strong, J. Bearden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Herndon
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Anchorage Police Department , Mark Mew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
