Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Topolski et al
as 3:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Rogers
Defendant:
John Topolski and Ian Schumaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Middletown et al
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Rogers
Defendant:
City of Middletown, Retired Chief of Police William McKenna, Sergeant Brian White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Moschouris et al
as 3:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephen Moschouris, Amtrak, Stephen J. Gardner and others
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Sequeira et al
as 3:2021cv00787
Plaintiff:
John Napoleone, Roger Falcone, Michael McClain and others
Defendant:
Shawn Sequeira, City of Shelton and Mark Lauretti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Chimney v. TD Banks et al
as 3:2021cv00263
Defendant:
TD Banks, Jane Doe, TD Canada Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Chimney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Department of Correction et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Correction, Angel Quiros and Roger Bowles
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Connecticut, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
