Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Criss v. Roll-Offs Trucking, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Brant Criss
Defendant:
Roll-Offs Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bruner v. Rolls-Royce Marine North America Inc.
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Mark Bruner
Defendant:
Rolls-Royce Marine North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Provine Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Rolls-Royce Corporation
as 4:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Provine Helicopter Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Rolls-Royce Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rolle v. Shults
as 3:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Erskine Rolle
Defendant:
L. Shults
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mullen v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brendan Mullen
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. , Rolls-Royce Corporation , T&M Aviation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strausbaugh v. Rolls-Royce et al
as 1:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Stephen Strausbaugh
Defendant:
Rolls-Royce , Anthony Woodard , Brian Everett and others
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Long et al v. Baber et al
as 1:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
Mark Long and Lisa Long
Defendant:
Shane T. Baber, Gulf Coast L&P, Inc., Gulf Breeze Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Amber Johnson v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 3:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Estate of Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP , Jerome E. Collins and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
