Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hester v. City of Oneida et al
as 6:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hester
Defendant:
City of Oneida, Detective David Salley, Officer Charles Zonnevylle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sislo v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2013cv01580
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sislo
Defendant:
City of Rome, Hollie Kennedy, Bryan M. Zoeckler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. City of Rome Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv04797
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
City of Rome Police Department, Fred Robenski, Jeff Race and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberta et al v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Liberta and Quintino D. Liberta
Defendant:
City of Rome, Rome Police Department and Ofr. Michael Yoxall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mock v. The City of Rome et al
as 6:2010cv00919
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Mock
Defendant:
The City of Rome and The City of Rome Police Department
Cause Of Action: Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
Mettot v. City of Rome, New York et al
as 6:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
Robert Mettot
Defendant:
City of Rome, New York, City of Rome Police Department, Jason A. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuff v. Rome Police Dept. et al
as 6:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Tuff
Defendant:
Rome Police Dept., Scott Hall, Inv. M. Ammann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams et al v. City of Rome, New York et al
as 6:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Paul Williams and G.B.
Defendant:
City of Rome, New York, City of Rome Police Department, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wishart v. The City of Rome et al
as 6:2007cv00987
Plaintiff:
George Wishart
Defendant:
The City of Rome, The City of Rome Police Department, Kevin James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
