Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Costa v. White DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE 5:24-CV-268-M-RN.
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Valeria Cesanelli
Petitioner:
Romeo Mathew Costa
Defendant:
James Joseph White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Costa v. White
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Romeo Mathew Costa
Defendant:
James Joseph White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Santana v. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Philip Santana
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc., Andy Frain Services, Inc., Romeo Kevante Pride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Mitcheson et al v. Mistylou Investments, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hinton, Tiffany Gray, Kimberly Cozzens and others
Defendant:
Mistylou Investments, LLC doing business as Tobie's Gentlemen's Club and Brian Donald Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Vail-Perez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00545
Petitioner:
Mynor Romeo Vail-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bhavsar v. Potere et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Spartan Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Matthew Potere, Barry Edinburg, Rodney Yoder and others
Rosario et al v. MAL Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessa Hinton, Kim Cozzens, Hillary hepner and others
Defendant:
MAL Entertainment, Inc., BLL Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Crazy Horse, David Baucom and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ratchford et al v. Gist & Hendrix, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Abigail Ratchford, Cielo Jean Gibson, Dessie Mitcheson and others
Defendant:
Gist & Hendrix, LLC d/b/a Secrets Cabaret, William Scott Hendrix, Cumberland Holdings, LLC d/b/a Secrets Cabaret and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
