Cases 1 - 10 of 347
Terrell D. Johnson v. Los Angeles Sheriff and Police Dept
as 2:2024cv02532
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Johnson
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriff and Police Dept, Jim McDonnell, Sal Loera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Ortega et al
as 5:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Isaias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jose Ortega, J. Thich, D. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Calderon et al
as 4:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Calderon, Romero, Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DeJesus v. Romero et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Joe S. DeJesus
Defendant:
J. Romero and A. Bustos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barnhardt v. Allison et al
as 1:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Barnhardt
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, McCabe, Ayala Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Romero v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01068
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola Romero
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) O'Connor v. Romero
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Glenn O'Connor
Defendant:
C. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Romero v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Jose Jony Romero
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
