Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Owens v. Romero et al
as 1:2020cv01110
Respondent:
Mike Romero and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner:
Gregory Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Than v. McKibbin et al
as 1:2020cv00766
Plaintiff:
Cong Than
Defendant:
Carol Trujillo, Jodi Brown, Cody McKibbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Romero et al
as 1:2020cv00734
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Respondent:
Mike Romero, Dean Williams and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00408
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lillie v. Romero et al
as 1:2020cv00410
Respondent:
Mike Romero and Colorado State Board of Adult Parole
Petitioner:
Jimmie Lillie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
People of the State of Colorado v. Romero
as 1:2020cv00347
Plaintiff:
Phillip Steve Romero
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romero v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00245
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Plaintiff:
Mario E Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Romero v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Romero and Kevin James Valdez
Defendant:
Mary Carlson, Colorado Department of Corrections, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx
Cary v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2019cv03690
Defendant:
Michael Romero and Berry Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anthony Cary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
