Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Pena v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00771
Defendant:
Police Officer C Velazquez, E J Okon, lice Officer Richard A Pruger and others
Plaintiff:
Rocio Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Salgado et al
as 1:2020cv00770
Defendant:
H.G. Salgado, E J Okon, lice Officer Richard A Pruger and others
Plaintiff:
Police Officer E Leighton and Jorge Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Total System Services, Inc., et al.,
as 1:2020cv00458
Defendant:
Total System Services, Inc., d/b/a Netspend and Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Romero individually an Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. IBuilders Corp.
as 1:2019cv08086
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Joint Cooperation Trust Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Scholarship Fund and others
Defendant:
Marco A. Romero and IBuilders Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Romero v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv06733
Defendant:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Romero v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2019cv06722
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Romero-Guiterrez v. Varga
as 1:2019cv05195
Petitioner:
Armando Romero-Guiterrez
Respondent:
John Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Varga et al
as 1:2019cv04991
Respondent:
John Varga
Petitioner:
Ramon Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 3:2018cv02044
Defendant:
Lt Davis, David Gomez, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
