Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cox v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03047
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Cox and Rebecca P Cox
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Cox
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cox v. Morton et al
as 2:2007cv02051
Petitioner:
Ronald Lawrence Cox
Respondent:
Danny Morton and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Morton et al
as 2:2007cv02037
Petitioner:
Ronald Lawrence Cox
Respondent:
Danny Morton and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: MDL - 1698 American General Life & Accident Insurance Co. Retiree Benefits ERISA litigation
as 3:2005md01698
Defendant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Consol Plaintiff:
Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres and others
Consol Third Party Plaintiff:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Co., American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company and others
Consol Third Party Defendant:
John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr. and others
Consol Defendant:
Oliver H. Bunton, Jr. and Aldora J. Thompson
Consol Counter Claimant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Consol Counter Defendant:
Raymond L. Addison and Raymond L. Addison
Mediator:
Terrence M. White
Counter Claimant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company and American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
