Cases 1 - 10 of 22
USA v. David Chandler
as 23-13836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RONALD CHANDLER
Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv21891
Plaintiff:
Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00574
Petitioner:
Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. David Chandler
as 21-13482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RONALD CHANDLER, a.k.a. Ronnie Chandler
Chandler v. Phoenix Services
as 21-10626
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark H. Fisher and Phoenix Services, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SuperTherm Heating Services, L.L.C., Newco Enterprises, L.L.C., Ronald Chandler and others
Chandler v. Phoenix Services LLC
as 20-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEWCO ENTERPRISES LLC, SUPERTHERM HEATING SERVICES, LLC, RONALD CHANDLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK H. FISHER and PHOENIX SERVICES LLC
Ronald Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-12925
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD CHANDLER
Chandler et al v. Phoenix Services LLC
as 7:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Newco Enterprises LLC, SuperTherm Heating Services, LLC, Chandler Mfg., LLC and others
Defendant:
Phoenix Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
David Chandler v. USA
as 16-12639
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RONALD CHANDLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Chandler v. USA
as 16-12640
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RONALD CHANDLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
