Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angelone et al v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kurt J Angelone, John Griffin Headrick, Adam Persell and others
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Ronald Haynes, AHCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plechner v. Haynes
as 3:2024cv05187
Petitioner:
Richard Plechner
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collier v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Aaron Christopher Collier
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kane v. Haynes et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, William Stockwell and Chlarson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Edward Lane Hart
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halfhill v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv01630
Petitioner:
Scott Lindsay Halfhill
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Patrick K Gibson
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
