Cases 1 - 10 of 21
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Smith v. King
as 21-60806
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Ronald King
Boyd v. King
as 21-60708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald King, Mississippi Correctional Facility Superintendent, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Doctor William Brazier and Joann Shivers, Assistant Warden
Ronald King, et al v. UA Local 91, et al
as 20-90016
Respondent:
UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, UNION OF PLUMBERS, FITTERS, WELDERS AND SERVICE TECHNICIANS, DAY & ZIMMERMANN NPS, INC., UNITED ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBERS, STEAMFITTERS, WELDERS AND HVAC TECHNICIANS and others
Petitioner:
BRIAN STRUGGS, CHRIS SAMUEL, RONALD KING and others
Christopher McCune v. Joann Shivers, Warden, et al
as 19-60470
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent and JOANN SHIVERS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEIL MCCUNE
Thomas Jones v. Ronald King, Superintendent
as 19-60173
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS H. JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
as 2:2014at00620
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
