Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Emrit v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01201
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Conrol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. AOL Time Warner, Inc.
as 14-709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant - Appellee:
AOL Time Warner, Inc., CNN Headline News and Vinnie Politan
Emrit v. National Academy of Recording
as 14-446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant - Appellee:
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, NARAS/Grammys, Billboard Magazine, Sonicbids and others
Emrit v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
AOL Time Warner, Inc., CNN Headline News and Vinnie Politan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Viacom/MTV
as 13-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant - Appellee:
Viacom/MTV, Fuse TV, Music Choice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emrit v. National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences et al
as 1:2013cv05050
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Billboard Magazine and Sonicbids
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Emrit v. Viacom/MTV et al
as 1:2013cv04909
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Viacom/MTV, Fuse TV, Music Choice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences et al
as 1:2013cv04736
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Billboard Magazine and Sonicbids
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
