Cases 11 - 20 of 311
Ronald Davenport v. CIR
as 23-1068
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE DAVENPORT
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ronald Davenport v. CIR
as 23-1074
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE DAVENPORT
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Firebird Manufacturing, LLC, v. Green Hygiencis Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Firebird Manufacturing, LLC, and Firebird Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant:
Green Hygiencis Holdings Inc. and Ronald Wayne Loudoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04278
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04279
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04277
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04274
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04276
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUNDVE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24143
Plaintiff:
RONALD WAYNE SUNDVE and RONALD SUNDVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. TX Parole Bd
as 7:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
TX Parole Bd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
