Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Caicedo v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Petitioner:
Elpis Rosales Caicedo
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Caicedo v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Elpis Rosales Caicedo
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rosales v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01314
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosales
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baguyo v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12102
Plaintiff:
Leonida Rosales Baguyo
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10838
Plaintiff:
Clara Rosales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06275
Plaintiff:
Florence Rosales and Robert Rosales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04901
Plaintiff:
Sandra Rosales and Adam Rosales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
as 2:2016cv03614
Petitioner:
Maria del Carmen Rosales Garcia
Respondent:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001
Rosales et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
San Juana Rosales and Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales-Henderson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16432
Plaintiff:
Lucille Rosales-Henderson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
