Cases 1 - 10 of 79
(PC) J'Weial v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00712
Defendant:
County of Amador, Kenny Kragle, Harrold Hold and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lumar J'Weial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Keel v. Diane Butler, et al
as 12-55859
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH G. KEEL
Respondent - Appellee:
DIANE K. BUTLER, Warden, Substituted for Rosanne Campbell and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnnie Peraza v. Rosanne Campbell
as 10-15629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE RAY PERAZA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL
Nabil Manley v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 12-15454
Petitioner - Appellant:
NABIL MANLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Real Party in interest Attorney General for the State of California and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Richard Anaya v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 11-17688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, N. GRANNIS, CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH, M.D. and others
Daniel Masterson v. Silvia Huerta-Garcia, et al
as 11-17389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SILVIA HUERTA-GARCIA, ROSANNE CAMPBELL, CDCR Correctional Manager, MICHAEL D. BUNNELL, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Bardo v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 11-16031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. BARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL and K. RUTHERFORD
Payman Borhan v. Rosanne Campbell
as 11-55101
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAYMAN BORHAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden Mule Creek State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
