Cases 11 - 20 of 1,029
Casilla Rosario v. Garland
as 24-645
Petitioner:
ROBERT A. CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Montanez-Chipana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1015
Petitioner:
ROSA MILAGROS MONTANEZ-CHIPANA and MARITZA DEL ROSARIO PUICAN-MONTANEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Orduno Torres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-844
Petitioner:
JESUS ORDUNO TORRES, CRISTIAN ROSARIO TORRES ORDUNO, NEYLI JIMENA TORRES ORDUNO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Casilla Rosario v. Searls
as 24-379
Petitioner:
ROBERT CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
In Re: Rivera-Rosario
as 24-1145
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RIVERA-ROSARIO
Respondent:
LSREF2 ISLAND HOLDINGS, LTD., INC.
Saba Rosario v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1196
Petitioner:
SABA ROSARIO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Boustani (Allam)
as 24-44
Defendant:
JEAN BOUSTANI, MANUEL CHANG, Jean Boustany and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NAJIB ALLAM and Naji Allam
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Gomez-Ruiz
as 23-4184
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSARIO ALBERTO GOMEZ-RUIZ and Rosario Gomez-Ruiz
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Gomez-Ruiz
as 23-4173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSARIO GOMEZ-RUIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
