Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Biscan et al v. Town of Wilmington et al
as 1:2023cv11170
Plaintiff:
Roberta Biscan, CB CB, Jennifer Baptista and others
Defendant:
Town of Wilmington, Kimberly Cummings, Victoria Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosario v. Neczypyr
as 1:2020cv10343
Plaintiff:
Adneil Rosario
Defendant:
Trooper Nicholas Neczypyr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Waterhouse et al
as 1:2019cv10532
Defendant:
William M Gilligan, John R Myers, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rosario v. Rhode Island Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv14055
Plaintiff:
Evaristo Rosario
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Correction, Rhode Island Adult Probation and Parole and Rhode Island Judiciary and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olmo v. Narker et al
as 1:2014cv13434
Plaintiff:
John Ivan Olmo
Defendant:
Steven Narker, Judy Lee, Peter Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Turner v. Northeastern University Public Safety Police et al
as 1:2013cv11183
Plaintiff:
Cardrienne Turner
Defendant:
Northeastern University Public Safety Police, Lt. Detective Sargent Cassinelli, Joseph Auon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Burton v. Rosario et al
as 1:2012cv11107
Plaintiff:
Robert Burton
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rosario, Felix Rosario, Stephen Teel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gershteyn v. Amoroso et al
as 1:2008cv10696
Plaintiff:
Boris Gershteyn
Defendant:
Joseph Amoroso, David Smith, Luis Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
