Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSARIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv06544
Plaintiff:
ADELINE ROSARIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
USA v. Angel Concepcion-Rosario
as 22-3082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS CONCEPCION-ROSARIO
LUGO-ROSARIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv04311
Plaintiff:
SOCORRO LUGO-ROSARIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rosario v. Jamison
as 3:2022cv01488
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chuni et al v. PJM Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jose Miranda Chuni and Elena Del Rosario Miranda
Defendant:
PJM Trucking, LLC, Evans Delivery Company, Inc. t/d/b/a Evans Delivery Company, Interpool, Inc. t/d/b/a Trac Intermodal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROSARIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2022cv04695
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO ROSARIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose, Robin Ross and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rosario v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Cook, G. Ralston and J. Rivello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
