Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Marquez et al v. Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Rosario Marquez, Saul Flores and Deodoro de Leon
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC and C. J. Coakley Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pacheco v. Streevel
as 7:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Misael Rosario Pacheco, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosario-Castro v. Commonwealth of Virgina
as 2:2021cv00523
Petitioner:
Alberto Rosario-Castro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virgina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pacheco v. Streeval
as 7:2021cv00389
Respondent:
J. C. Streeval
Petitioner:
Misael Rosario Pacheco, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIORANI v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2020cv01580
Defendant:
Karen Hicks, PNC Bank N.A., Christabel Ifeoma Obi and others
Plaintiff:
Rosario "Ross" Fiorani
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams et al v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations et al
as 4:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Shelly Adam, Gwendolyn Barilleux, Lisa Manno and others
Defendant:
Orange Lake Resorts, Roe Corporations, 1-10, Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hernandez De Canizales v. KE&FB, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01619
Defendant:
Fred Bazzaz, Keyvan Ejtemai, KE&FB, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rosario M Hernandez De Canizales
Manzaneda v. Duenas et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Manzaneda
Defendant:
Aida Duenas, Joseph Luis Rosario, Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Manzaneda v. Duenas et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Manzaneda
Defendant:
Aida Duenas and Joseph Luis Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosario-Calderon v. USA
as 3:2016cv00476
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos R. Rosario-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
