Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Winding v. Sistrunk et al
as 4:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
B. Sistrunk, John Wright, Jaime Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Medtronic Incorporated et al
as 5:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rose Wood
Defendant:
Medtronic Incorporated and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Wayne County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Wayne County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Leah Parson
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Bryant et al
as 4:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
Clayton Bryant and Rose Mary Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00302
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rose
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Variety Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Glenda F. Gaddis and Bennie R. Gaddis
Defendant:
Variety Stores, Inc. , Rose's Stores, Inc. , John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nodarse v. Rose et al
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Alexander Nodarse
Defendant:
Rose, Paterson, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
