Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEWIS v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2024cv08298
Defendant:
ANDY MURRAY, CHANELL JOHNSON, ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
MPIRE EXPRESS TRUST MICHAEL LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIEUJUSTE et al v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE et al
as 2:2022cv02607
Plaintiff:
TYRON DIEUJUSTE, MAYA HOLMES and JALIL SPANN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CARLOS GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BANKS v. FBI et al
as 2:2019cv09367
Plaintiff:
LAKISHA BANKS
Defendant:
FBI, UNION COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRADA et al v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE et al
as 2:2015cv08052
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DRADA and DAVID VEGA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER WILLIAM LORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quaiser v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv02873
Plaintiff:
Fouzan Quaiser
Defendant:
State of Illinois, University of Illionis at Chicago, Will County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALSEY v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE et al
as 2:2010cv06129
Plaintiff:
IBRAHIM HALSEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, BOROUGH OF ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BYRNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOSS v. OSTY et al
as 2:2010cv03497
Plaintiff:
ANDRE DOSS
Defendant:
JOSEPH OSTY, MATTHEW JAKUBOWSKI, VICTOR CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDLE et al v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE et al
as 2:2008cv04840
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE RANDLE, KHISHA BETHEA and JERMAINE RANDLE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, BOROUGH OF ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CRAIG HOWLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
