Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, ROSLYN HUNEKE, GARY ASBERRY and others
Whittenberger v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie, Barry Daughtry, Melissa McFarlane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy R. Whittenberger v. Daniel Winkleski, et al
as 23-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY R. WHITTENBERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL WINKLESKI, ROSLYN HUNEKE, TAMMY STURMNESS and others
Whittenberger, Leroy v. Winkleski, Daniel et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Leroy R. Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel Winkleski, Roslyn Huneke, Tammy Sturmness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breyley, James v. Huneke, Roslyn et al
as 3:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
James Kendall Breyley, III
Defendant:
Roslyn Huneke, Barry Daughtry and Holly Gunderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates, Michael v. Hoffman, Karl et al
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Michael Yates
Defendant:
Karl Hoffman, Roslyn Huneke and Medical Director, WI DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Breyley, III v. Larry Fuchs, et al
as 22-1663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES K. BREYLEY, III
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS, DON STRAHOTA, Warden, CANDACE WARNER and others
Machicote, Anthony v. Hoffman, Karl et al
as 3:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jason Machicote
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe, Physician John Doe, Dr. Karl Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Winkleski et al
as 3:2021cv00267
Defendant:
B Mueller, Roslyn Huneke, Dan Winkleski and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Carr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Winkleski et al
as 2:2021cv00453
Defendant:
B Mueller, Roslyn Huneke, Dan Winkleski and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Carr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
