Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kitchen v. Ross County Court of Common Pleas
as 2:2019cv03618
Petitioner:
Michael Kitchen
Defendant:
Ross County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cremeans v. Warden Ross County Correctonal Institution
as 2:2018cv00633
Respondent:
Warden Ross County Correctonal Institution
Petitioner:
Randall Cremeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins, Jr. v. Warden Ross County Correctonal Institution
as 2:2014cv00579
Petitioner:
Maurice Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Ross County Correctonal Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Ross County et al
as 2:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Leland Lee Brown
Defendant:
Ross County, George Lavender, Jr. and Alice Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Warden, Ross County Correctional Institution
as 3:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
James Pierce
Respondent:
Warden, Ross County Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Jewell et al
as 2:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Dale G. Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Jewell, Mrs. Harris, Mrs. Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jewell et al
as 1:2009cv00491
Plaintiff:
Dale G. Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Jewell, Mrs. Harris, Mrs. Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Nichols et al
as 2:2008cv00210
Petitioner:
Ivan W Thompson
Respondent:
Ron Nichols, State of Ohio, Prosecuter and Ross County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dugger v. Warden Ross County Correctional Institute
as 2:2007cv00996
Petitioner:
Elliott L Dugger
Respondent:
Warden Ross County Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
