Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Tonneyck et al v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Reony Tonneyck, Robert Hann and Ronald Hinton
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Roxanne Bowman, Elaine L. Chao and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Tom M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Roy v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Jayshawn R. Allen v. Deputy Roxann Accuna et al
as 2:2023cv10060
Plaintiff:
Dominique Ortiz, Jayshawn R. Allen, D. T. and others
Defendant:
Co of Los Angeles, Javier Ochoa, roxann acuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Purdagone v. State of California et al
as 1:2023at00770
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Purdagone
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and Greg Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
