Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pinson v. Cheatham, et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, J. Taylor, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Downing v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brian L Downing
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Manuel Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Howard v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 5:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Cartez K. Howard
Defendant:
F.B.O.P., Lt. Roy Cheatham and Kevin E. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson et al v. Phelps et al
as 5:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Marlon A. Wilson, Gregory Fuller, Steve Boria and others
Defendant:
James Phelps, B.M. Antonelly, Roy Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2021cv23236
Plaintiff:
Marlon A. Wilson, Gregory Fuller, Steve Boria and others
Defendant:
James Phelps, B.M. Antonelly, Roy Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wright
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitetto v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00184
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Whitetto
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, J.A. Keller, Roy Cheatham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Kathy Lane, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Kara Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Kathy Lane, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Kara Adams
Petitioner:
Gail Owens, Sailor Jones, Quinetta Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allah v. Ramos et al
as 5:2019cv00451
Defendant:
FNU Chavis, Roy Cheatham, FNU Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
