Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jamarr Kuilan v. John Zimmerman, et al
as 22-5331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMARR JUAN KUILAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ZIMMERMAN, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, ROYCE TAYLOR, in his individual and official capacity, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his individual and official capacity District Attorney General and others
Kuilan v. Zimmermann et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Juan Kuilan
Defendant:
John C. Zimmermann, Judge Royce Taylor, Jennings Hutson Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34433
Plaintiff:
AARON ROYCE TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drennon v. Taylor et al
as 3:2016cv02824
Plaintiff:
Royce Drennon
Defendant:
Royce Taylor and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royce Drennon v. Royce Taylor, et al
as 16-5641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYCE GAYLE DRENNON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYCE TAYLOR and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Drennon v. Taylor et al
as 3:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Royce Drennon
Defendant:
Royce Taylor and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Taylor
as 15-5126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON ROYCE TAYLOR, AKA Bran Bran, AKA Larry Thomas
Royce Drennon v. Royce Taylor, et al
as 15-5613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYCE GAYLE DRENNON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROYCE TAYLOR and ASSISTANT D.A. JOHN ZIMMERMAN
Drennon v. Taylor et al
as 3:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Royce G. Drennon
Defendant:
Royce Taylor and John Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. USA
as 4:2014cv00176
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brandon Royce Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
