Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Terrance Brown v. Matt Hill, et al
as 11-30111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE T. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT HILL, GEORGE BRITTON, SHANNON HARKINS and others
William Muse v. Ouachita Parish, et al
as 10-30521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. MUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OUACHITA PARISH, ROYCE TONEY, JAY RUSSELL and others
Muse v. Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2009cv02230
Plaintiff:
William A Muse
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, Royce Toney, Jay Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Stanley v. Ouachita Correctional Center, et al
as 09-31034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KEITH STANLEY, also known as Tim Fowler
Defendant - Appellee:
OUACHITA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ROYCE TONEY, MEDICAL STAFF OF OUACHITA CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cappy Sanders v. Royce Toney, et al
as 09-30718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAPPY D. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYCE TONEY, BRIAN NEWCOMER and MEDICAL STAFF OF OUACHITA CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Conerly v. Newcomer et al
as 3:2009cv01220
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Conerly
Defendant:
Brian Newcomer, Royce Toney and Rosatta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Degrate v. Royce Toney, et al
as 09-30548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM EARL DEGRATE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYCE TONEY and BRIAN NEWCOMER
Stanley v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stanley
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center, Royce Toney, Medical Staff of Ouachita Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leleaux v. Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leleaux, Jr
Defendant:
Ouachita Parish, Mayor City of West Monroe, West Monroe City Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Toney et al
as 3:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Jones
Defendant:
Royce Toney and Brian Newcomer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
