Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Andrew Fields, III v. Patrick Bouldin, et al
as 22-5133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. BOULDIN, FRANK W. HEFT, JR., ROBERT BRUCE BONAR and others
Young v. City of Paris et al
as 5:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Officer Lewis Boyer, Cody Hensley, Chief Michael Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Emmalee Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Bouldin et al
as 3:2020cv00705
Defendant:
Bottoms, Patrick J. Bouldin, Frank W. Heft, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Hart et al
as 5:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Lieutenit Melissa A. Rogers, Fredrick Rogers, Correctional Officer J. Earls and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanio L. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royse et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
Donna Royse
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royse v. SSA
as 0:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Clyde Royse
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Elaine Royse v. Reed Wilber
as 16-5199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELAINE ROYSE
Defendant - Appellee:
REED WILBERS, in his individual capacity
Royse v. Wilbers
as 3:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elaine Royse
Defendant:
Reed Wilbers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Royse v. Cohart Refractories Company, I, et al
as 08-6508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. ROYSE
Defendant:
COHART REFRACTORIES COMPANY, INC., AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, L.D. MAY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNING GLASS WORKS, INC.
Royse v. Cohart Refractories Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
John A. Royse
Defendant:
Cohart Refractories Company, Inc., Edgar A. Zingman and L.D. May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
