Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2018cv00768
Plaintiff:
WARREN R. HARRIS
Defendant:
MURIEL E. BOWSER , TANYA A. ROYSTER , MARK J. CHASTANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv02131
Plaintiff:
KEITH ANDERSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , MURIEL BOWSER , TANYA A. ROYSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYSTER v. GLUNT
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROYSTER
Defendant:
GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYSTER v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY et al
as 1:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
GAIL ROYSTER
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ELIZABETH A. HERMAN, ELIZABETH J. BRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COAKLEY et al v. CIGNA GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00976
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE K. COAKLEY, FRANCES W. ROYSTER, THERESA A. TORRISI and others
Defendant:
CIGNA GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC, NHIC, CORP., KERRY N. WEEMS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PENNINGTON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02274
Plaintiff:
MARY PENNINGTON, GLENNA RIVKIN, SHARON ROYSTER-DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
