Cases
Abukar Abdulle, et al v. Robert Sillen, et al
as 22-15319
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABUKAR ABDULLE, RUBEN ARECHIGA, GARLAND BAKER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT SILLEN, Former Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services and JOHN CLARK KELSO, Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv07065
Plaintiff: Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant: Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00731
Plaintiff: Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant: Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff: Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant: Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff: Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff: Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. McQuarn et al
as 2:2014at00586
Plaintiff: Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant: Charles McQuarn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?