Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Rubinstein et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv12685
Petitioner:
Jacob Rubinstein, Jeffrey Armstrong, Thomas Bauer and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D&B Rubinstein Enterprises, LLC et al v. A&G Franchising, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00835
Plaintiff:
Barry Rubinstein, D&B Rubinstein Enterprises, LLC, Doris Rubinstein and others
Defendant:
Gina Butler, A&G Franchising, LLC and Alan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herr LLC et al v. Wingfield Capital Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Herr, LLC and Kelly Dlesk
Defendant:
Wingfield Capital Corporation and Alexander Rubinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rubinstein et al v. Temple Israel
as 2:2015cv13969
Defendant:
Temple Israel
Plaintiff:
Ruvayn Rubinstein and Sara Rubinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jonathan Riches v. Harvard Business Review
as 10-5987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, dba Steven Rubinstein, aka Bernard L. Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, dba Harvard Business School Publishing, aka hbr.org
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
