Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FREEMAN et al v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02558
Plaintiff:
STAFFORD FREEMAN, III and NICOLE FREEMAN
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC. and RUBY TUESDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KLARIC et al v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
as 2:2012cv00584
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. KLARIC and LISA KLARIC
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
KOSTRINSKI v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
YOAV KOSTRINSKI
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC., JOHN DOE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES #1-5 and ABC CORPORATION RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
as 2:2012mc00019
Petitioner:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Respondent:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
BURNS v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00675
Plaintiff:
MARY BURNS
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC. , JOHN DOE OWNER (1-100) and JANE DOE MAINTENANCE PERSON (1-100)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. ACCU-MEASUREMENTS, LLC et al v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
as 2:2010cv05011
Plaintiff:
U.S. ACCU-MEASUREMENTS, LLC and ROSS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLOW GROVE 2300 ARC, L.P. et al v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
as 2:2009cv05001
Plaintiff:
WILLOW GROVE 2300 ARC, L.P. and WILLOW GROVE 2300 GALLUB, L.P.
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
VORNADO REALTY TRUST et al v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
as 2:2009cv05467
Plaintiff:
VORNADO REALTY TRUST, NORTH PLAINFIELD VF, LLC and TURNERSVILLE INTERSTATE LLC
Defendant:
RUBY TUESDAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
