Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.In re: Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
as 22-20654
Petitioner:
In re: Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Resendez, Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv04156
Petitioner:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.In re: Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
as 22-20506
Petitioner:
In re: Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Resendez v. Lumpkin
as 21-50589
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Phonso Rayford, Senior Warden, Connally Unit
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Resendez v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2021cv00481
Petitioner:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Phonso Rayford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rudolph Resendez, Jr. v. Greg Abbott, Governor, et al
as 20-50647
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Resendez v. Abbott et al
as 5:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Vernet Davis, Lorie Davis, Larissa Wysocki and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph Resendez, Jr. v. United States, et al
as 20-20014
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, GREGG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH RESENDEZ, JR.
Rudolph Resendez, Jr. v. United States, et al
as 19-20804
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, UNITED STATES and LORIE DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH RESENDEZ, JR.
Resendez v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv04150
Defendant:
United States, Gregg Abbott and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Resendez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
