Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ruff v. DRM Inc.
as 1:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Alex Ruff
Defendant:
DRM Inc. doing business as Arby's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Miller et al v. Ruff Leasing LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Horace Miller and Zakiyyah Miller
Defendant:
Ruff Leasing LLC and Mei Lien Lai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hale v. The City of Roswell Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Donte Leon Hale
Defendant:
The City of Roswell Police Department, Officer C.T. Jackson, J. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Amy Ruff
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Peggy Slappey Properties v. Ruff
as 1:2021cv02534
Defendant:
Kia Chantel Ruff
Plaintiff:
Peggy Slappey Properties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hale v. The City of Roswell et al
as 1:2021cv00738
Defendant:
J. D. Ruff, J. Wescott, C. T. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Leon Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2017md02800
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC., Customer Date Security Breach Litigation, Equifax, Inc., Charles Stimac, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
David H. Yoder, Aventa Credit Union, Garry Randall and others
Petitioner:
Gregory A. Simons, Peter J. LaBreck, Elizabeth M. Simons and others
Not Classified By Court:
John William Davis, David R. Watkins, Christopher Andrews and others
Claimant:
Mike Barry and Kimberly J. Kohler
Amicus Curiae:
State of Indiana as Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
