Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SPEARMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52790
Plaintiff:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HARRISON, CASE MANAGER KRETZ, PSYCHOLOGIST MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Spearman v. Heyns et al
as 2:2020cv11558
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mark Machulis, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Spearman v. MI, et al
as 20-1476
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS G. FINCO, ROBERT NAPEL, Warden, SHANE PLACE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Spearman v. Parson et al
as 2:2018cv10673
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mary Parson, Rick Raymond, Hanna Saad and others
Spearman v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv13495
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Chad H. Williams, Osbourne, Gehoski and others
Spearman v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv12200
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and David M. Leach
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-2143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
