Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Runge v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Roger Runge
Defendant:
Chief Eric D. Smith, Deputy Chief Chad Ochivzzo, Supervisor Ashlee Windler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUNGE v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUNGE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY DIXON, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rung v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81486
Plaintiff:
John Rung
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUNGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48660
Plaintiff:
CODY RUNGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28691
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JARED EDWARD RUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15807
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CHARLES RUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runge v. Target Corporation
as 6:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Roger Runge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17744
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN RUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv49971
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN L RUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. PALEN et al
as 3:2019cv00505
Plaintiff:
LASHUNDA BROWN
Defendant:
CYNTHIA PALEN, DAVID MORGAN, MICHAEL RUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
