Cases 21 - 30 of 37
ANGLEN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ALLEN ANGLEN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHRETIEN et al
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RUSSELL CHRETIEN , SADIE L CHRETIEN , NOVILLA ROLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANDLER et al v. MAYHEW et al
as 1:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR HANDLER and RUSSELL HANDLER
Defendant:
MARY MAYHEW, DEBRA POTTER, CLAUDIA KJER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAINE, BUREAU OF CORPORATIONS, ELECTIONS AND COMMISSIONERS and STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. PEASE et al
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS GILBERT
Defendant:
ROBERT PEASE, SCOTT DRAKE, RUSSELL WORCESTER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2010cv00382
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL , HARLEY G LAPPIN , FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DAVIS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PRESCOTT v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE PRESCOTT , SHANNON ROSE , LAURA ORDWAY and others
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
