Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Perry v. Collier et al
as 2:2019cv00137
Defendant:
R. Guevara, R Samaniego, J. Herbst and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Smith v. Livingston et al
as 9:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Ruth Brouwer and Dr. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Ruth Brouwer and Dr. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Evans v. Ruth Brouwer, et al
as 15-40372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH BROUWER, MARK ROBERTS, PATRICK MULDOWNEY and others
Arthur Barker v. Ruth Brouwer, et al
as 14-40947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR JOYAL BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH BROUWER, Medical Practitioner, JOYCE FRANCIS, Vocational Nurse and THOMAS MACIEL, Registered Nurse
Smart v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Perry Smart
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Flentroy v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 14-40308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE FLENTROY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, Individually and in his/her official capacity, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Individually and in his/her official capacity, NANCY MITCHELL, Individually and in his/her official capacity and others
Perry et al v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry, Quincey Pillette, Perry Smart and others
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pillette v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Quincy Pillette
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Stephens et al
as 9:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
Matthew Garcia
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles W. Bell, Joseph Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.